<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss 
    xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" 
    version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Justice Gambit</title>
        <description>An overview of issues related to the administration of the U.S. criminal justice system from a social science perspective.</description>
        <link>http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/podcasts.htm</link>
        <copyright>2007 Michael B. Blankenship</copyright>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:46:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
        <managingEditor>mblanken@boisestate.edu</managingEditor>
        <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:41:13 -0600</pubDate>
        <generator>FeedForAll v2.0 (2.0.2.9) unlicensed version http://www.feedforall.com</generator>
        <itunes:subtitle>Overview of criminal justice issues.</itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:summary>This podcast covers a host of issues related to the administration of the criminal justice system. Typical issues include the police, courts, and corrections systems. Special emphasis is placed on the death penalty and white-collar crime.</itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Michael B. Blankenship</itunes:author>
        <itunes:owner>
            <itunes:name>Michael B. Blankenship</itunes:name>
            <itunes:email>mblanken@boisestate.edu</itunes:email>
        </itunes:owner>
        <itunes:category text="Science &amp; Medicine">
            <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
        </itunes:category>
        <itunes:category text="Government &amp; Organizations">
            <itunes:category text="National"/>
        </itunes:category>
        <itunes:category text="News &amp; Politics"/>
        <itunes:keywords>justice, social science, police, courts, corrections, prisons, crime, criminals, death penalty, white-collar crime</itunes:keywords>
        <itunes:image href="http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/images/justicegambit.jpg"/>
        <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
        
        <item>
            <title>Episode 1 - Death Penalty Overview</title>
            <description>A brief overview of issues related to capital punishment - race, innocence, deterrence, cost, public opinion are introduced.</description>
            <link>http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/Episode_1.htm</link>
            <author>mblanken@boisestate.edu</author>
            <enclosure url="http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/podcasts/Episode%201%20-%20Death%20Penalty%20Overview.mp3" length="12714" type="audio/mpeg"/>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">8D3D5FED-5CA5-45F9-B9C5-D37C47B73FC0</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 21:52:21 -0600</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>Brief introduction to issues in the administration of the death penalty.</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>As of July, 2007, 1087 executions have occurred in the U.S. since 1976. Over 120 individuals have been exonerated. These are just a few of the issues introduced in this episode.</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>13:35</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:author>Michael B. Blankenship</itunes:author>
            <itunes:keywords>death penalty, race, innocence, public opinion, cost</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
            <itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Episode 2 - Death Penalty Attitudes</title>
            <description>Do you favor or oppose the death penalty? Why? Some of the reasons for support and opposition are discussed. Demographics, trends, and the Marshall Hypothesis are also presented.</description>
            <link>http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/Episode_2.htm</link>
            <enclosure url="http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/Podcasts/Episode%202%20-%20Death%20penalty%20Attitudes.mp3" length="9573" type="audio/mpeg"/>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">F08E9305-62F1-41F7-9DFD-04D2A3063656</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:28:17 -0600</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>Public attitudes toward capital punishment.</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>Public support for the death penalty is a mile wide, but an inch deep. However, since 2000, public support for capital punishment has declined. Demographics, trends, and the Marshall Hypothesis are discussed.</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>10:11</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:author>Michael B. Blankenship</itunes:author>
            <itunes:keywords>public attitudes, demographics, innocence</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
            <itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Episode 3 - Deterrence, Brutalization, and Future Dangerousness</title>
            <description>General deterrence is a primary goal of punishment. However, research suggests that capital punishment is no more effective than is life in prison. Other issues related to deterrence are also discussed.</description>
            <link>http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/Episode_3.htm</link>
            <enclosure url="http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/Podcasts/Episode%203%20-%20Deterrence.mp3" length="15772" type="audio/mpeg"/>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">9A093500-3679-4AD9-BA16-3016DE3018A9</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:22:43 -0600</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>Does the death penalty deter?</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>Research suggests that capital punishment is no more or no less of a general deterrent than life in prison. Some research suggests well publicized executions are associated with slight increases in murder. Future dangerousness of convicted murders is not currently possible to predict with any degree of reliability.</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>16:51</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:author>Michael B. Blankenship</itunes:author>
            <itunes:keywords>general deterrence, future dangerousness, brutalization</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
            <itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Episode 5 - Executing Women, Juveniles, and Mentally-Retarded Offenders</title>
            <description>Since 1975, 11 women, 22 juveniles, and 44 mentally-retarded offenders have been executed in the U.S. No other country has executed more juveniles since 1990. Recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions have barred executions of juveniles, and ostensibly the mentally-retarded, but this issue is still being contested.</description>
            <link>http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/Episode_5.htm</link>
            <enclosure url="http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/Podcasts/Episode%205%20-%20Executing%20Women,%20Juveniles,%20and%20the%20Mentally%20Retarded.mp3" length="8618" type="audio/mpeg"/>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">F4F8648C-4647-48FB-87B3-AD3066FBA6F2</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:35:37 -0600</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>Executing women, juveniles, &amp; mentally-retarded offenders</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>Until recently, the U.S. has executed more juveniles than any other country since 1990. Only 11 women have been executed in the modern era. The issue of executing mentally-retarded offenders is still unresolved even though the U.S. Supreme Court banned executions.</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>9:12</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:author>Michael B. Blankenship</itunes:author>
            <itunes:keywords>Executions, women, juveniles, mentally-retarded offenders, 8th Amendment, international law</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
            <itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Episode 6 - Is the Death Penalty Constitutional?</title>
            <description>The U.S. Supreme Court declared the manner in which the death penalty was administered prior to 1972 was cruel and unusual. In 1976, several states tested their new death penalty statutes, 3 of them successfully. This episode explores the plethora of constitutional issues that have arisen since 1976.</description>
            <link>http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/Episode_6.htm</link>
            <author>mblanken@boisestate.edu</author>
            <category domain="Social%20Science">Science &amp; Medicine</category>
            <enclosure url="http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/Podcasts/Episode%206%20-%20Constitutionality.mp3" length="10002" type="audio/mpeg"/>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">01D06C92-767A-43CF-BD45-96C2FF799E15</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:08:39 -0600</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>Constitutional issues and the death penalty.</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>A plethora of constitutional issues have arisen since the death penalty process was reinstated in 1976. The U.S. Supreme Court accepted the new plan proposed by Georgia. research has shown that many of these reforms have failed to work as intended.</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>10:41</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:author>Michael B. Blankenship</itunes:author>
            <itunes:keywords>cruel and unusual punishment, race, guided discretion</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
            <itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Episode 7 - Effective Counsel</title>
            <description>The 6th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution ostensibly guarantees the right to the assistance of legal counsel. In this episode, we review the history of this doctrine and the current failure to uphold the ideals in Gideon v. Wainwright.</description>
            <link>http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/Episode_7.htm</link>
            <author>mblanken@boisestate.edu</author>
            <category domain="Social%20Science">Science &amp; Medicine</category>
            <enclosure url="http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/Podcasts/Episode%207%20-%20Effective%20Counsel.mp3" length="10598" type="audio/mpeg"/>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">0237E69F-26AE-4737-9E6B-066FA630C507</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:22:47 -0600</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>Effective legal counsel in capital cases.</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>The U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to legal counsel, but fails to address the issue of competence. Thus the stage is set for indigent defendants to receive ineffective legal counsel while the courts and Congress have virtually eliminated habeas corpus review in capital cases.</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>11:19</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:author>Michael B. Blankenship</itunes:author>
            <itunes:keywords>6thAmendment, effective counsel,</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
            <itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Episode 8 - Mitigation and the Capital Trial Process</title>
            <description>Since 1976, a process of guided discretion has been imposed in death penalty trials. This exposed explores the research into the workings of the capital trial process.</description>
            <link>http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/Episode_8.htm</link>
            <author>mblanken@boisestate.edu</author>
            <enclosure url="http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/Podcasts/Episode%208%20-%20Mitigation.mp3" length="15295" type="audio/mpeg"/>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">57BA7340-489E-4AE9-AAA4-5100526B4F2A</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:44:08 -0600</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>Mitigation and the Capital Trial Process</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>After 1976, a process was implemented to guide the discretion of jurors. Subsequent research has shown that many facets do not work as intended. Many of these items undermine the fairness and impartiality of the trial process.</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>16:20</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:author>Michael B. Blankenship</itunes:author>
            <itunes:keywords>mitigation, death-qualified jurors, bifuricated trial</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
            <itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Episode 9 - International Issues and the Death Penalty</title>
            <description>The U.S. is part of  rapid shrinking group of countries that currently retain the death penalty. U.S. foreign policy is also jeopardized because of the retention of capital punishment and the violations of international treaties.</description>
            <link>http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/Episode_9.htm</link>
            <author>mblanken@boisestate.edu</author>
            <enclosure url="http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/Podcasts/Episode%209%20-%20International%20Issues.mp3" length="9148" type="audio/mpeg"/>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">CDD298E9-807D-4FD7-8691-0C0EB3C8062D</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:32:09 -0600</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>International issues and the death penalty.</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>Recent U.S. policy regarding the application of the death penalty has compromised foreign policy in addition to numerous violations of international law. The U.S. reputation as a defender of human rights has been seriously damaged by recent actions.</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>9:46</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:author>Michael B. Blankenship</itunes:author>
            <itunes:keywords>international law, death row phenomenon</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
            <itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Episode 11 - Life on Death Row</title>
            <description>This episode explores some of the issues facing death row inmates, their families, and policy makers. The death row phenomenon is also discussed, including international implications.</description>
            <link>http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/Episode_11.htm</link>
            <author>mblanken@boisestate.edu</author>
            <category domain="Social%20Science">Science &amp; Medicine</category>
            <enclosure url="http://cja.boisestate.edu/mblanken/Podcasts/Episode%2011%20-%20Life%20on%20Death%20Row.mp3" length="7928" type="audio/mpeg"/>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">51B526F4-4E32-4F38-9114-5B943C1465C3</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:41:13 -0600</pubDate>
            <itunes:subtitle>Life on Death Row</itunes:subtitle>
            <itunes:summary>Life on death row has been described by a variety of individuals from different perspectives, but with some common adjectives. Citizens should understand what the state is doing in their name and the implications of current policies.</itunes:summary>
            <itunes:duration>8:28</itunes:duration>
            <itunes:author>Michael B. Blankenship</itunes:author>
            <itunes:keywords>life on death row, international law</itunes:keywords>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
            <itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
