spring 2007 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demographic changes, education and earnings gaps between Hispanics and Non-Hispanic Whites in Idaho
This trend has been very discouraging for racial and ethnic minority groups nationwide. Hispanics/Latinos have been particularly disadvantaged because they have historically been left behind in educational attainment. Census 2000 statistics suggested that Hispanics throughout the nation have the lowest educational and income levels, and the highest poverty and high school dropout rates, followed by African Americans and Native Americans. Of Hispanic Americans, more than 85 percent are Mexican Americans, of whom only 46 percent have received a high school diploma and 7 percent have obtained a bachelor’s degree in the United States (Census 1970, 1980, 1990 & 2000; CPS 2006; Ramirez 2004). This is especially the case in states such as Idaho, where the populations with the lowest education are also the groups growing at the fastest rate. In 2005, the Hispanic population comprised about 10 percent of Idaho's 1.5 million residents, with a median age of 21 years old, relative to that of non-Hispanic whites (35 years old). The younger age Hispanic group suggests a rapidly growing Hispanic workforce in Idaho’s labor economy in the near future. The persistent socioeconomic inequality across racial/ethnic groups at both the national and local levels seems to suggest that most state systems of higher education have largely failed to address the social significance and policy implications related to the inequality issues. How educated is Idaho?
percent in 2000) than the same group nationally (30 percent). That year, Idaho ranked 38th in the number of students who earned an undergraduate degree or higher, compared to the District of Columbia (more than 45 percent), Massachusetts (about 38 percent), Colorado (36 percent), Connecticut (36 percent), Maryland (35 percent) and New Jersey (35 percent), to name a few. Moreover, Idaho*s educational attainment was not evenly distributed across the state. The areas with the highest educational attainment are in Blaine County, followed by the Boise and Pocatello metropolitan areas and some areas in Central West Idaho and Northwest Idaho (Table 1). The percentage with a bachelor’s degree or higher ranged from approximately 38 percent to 60 percent in these areas. Educational attainment by race/Hispanic origin
Looking at the education of the Hispanic population age 25 and over, not only were a majority of Hispanic adult workers located at the bottom of Idaho’s educational hierarchy between 2000 and 2005, the share of Hispanic/Latino Americans with a college degree or higher in Idaho dropped. At the same time, the percent of Hispanics with no high school diploma or less increased. Hispanics with no high school made up about 42 percent of the Hispanic population in 2005, up from 37 percent in 2000. The proportion of Hispanics with a high school diploma or GED also declined, from 23.6 percent in 2000 to 23.3 percent in 2005. Furthermore, the share of Hispanics with some college but no degree dropped considerably, from about 20.8 percent in 2000 to only 13.2 percent in 2005. Hispanics with a college degree or higher made up only 12 percent of the total Hispanic population in 2000; that number dropped to 5 percent in 2005. Foreign-born Hispanics were the most disadvantaged group in Idaho, with the least amount of education and thus the lowest social standing.
These numbers suggest that the educational system in Idaho has not been able to raise the educational levels of Hispanic and Native Americans at the pace of non-Hispanic whites and Asian Americans, especially at the higher levels. The gaps in educational attainment reveal important policy implications. First, Idaho may lose ground in the proportion of its labor force with a college degree. The most significant growth will take place in the population with less than a high school education. Second, Idaho’s personal earnings will decline in the near future relative to other states due to a lack of a highly educated and skilled work force. This will also have a negative influence on the tax contributed to Idaho and its capacity to provide services such as higher education, health care, school lunch, Social Security, etc. Earning gap based on education Over the last decades, information-related jobs grew at a faster rate and in larger numbers than other occupations and industries, rewarding workers with higher levels of earnings. Recent empirical evidence has shown that more than two-thirds of employees working at these jobs received at least some postsecondary education between 1959 and 1997. In recent years, the largest growth coupled with the highest pay has been found in high-tech and service-related jobs (Carnevale, et al. 2001). In contrast, manufacturing and farm-related occupations have experienced a major decline. Because these jobs do not require higher or advanced education, the proportion of Hispanics and other racial groups with less than a high school education working at these occupations has increased drastically. Because manufacturing and farm work tends to pay less with little growth in earnings, the socioeconomic inequality between manual workers and those in service industries has become worse than ever. Given the increasing racial/ethnic gaps in education and the existing lower levels of earnings, as well as under-representation of Hispanic and Native Americans in higher education, it will be very difficult to reach racial/ethnic equality in the information technology and service-based sectors of employment.
Tables 2 and 3 show average personal earnings by race and Hispanic origin between 2000 and 2005 in Idaho and the U.S. Over this time period, the earnings discrepancy between workers with a graduate degree and those without has continued to grow. The average earnings of a worker with a graduate degree is at least two to three times higher than for workers with an undergraduate degree or less. In Idaho, overall personal earnings of non-Hispanic whites in 2000 and 2005 exceeded those of other racial/ethnic groups at comparable educational levels. Specifically, the average earnings of non-Hispanic whites across all educational levels increased by a larger margin than other racial/ethnic groups, although the magnitude of increased earnings varied by educational levels and gender. The average personal earnings for non-Hispanic white workers with a bachelor’s degree or higher increased significantly, while workers with a high school diploma or less experienced no real increase in earnings, and those without a high school diploma lost ground. Discussion & conclusion
The overall results of this analysis verify the demographic trends in relation to racial/ethnic composition, and educational and income attainment observed in the Idaho population. Numerous demographers and sociologists have asserted that demographic characteristics, such as age structure, educational attainment and social equality among racial/ethnic groups, have an important impact on economic prosperity. An analysis on the changing population patterns in Idaho can provide insight into demographic characteristics associated with cultural diversity, social change and the decision-making process of public policies. In conclusion, the size of Idaho’s lower-middle class (lower-educated/skilled labor force) is growing drastically, while the richer middle- and upper-middle class is shrinking. Despite the overall improvements in educational attainment, Hispanic and Native Americans in Idaho still lag behind in educational attainment and overall changes in mean personal earnings. At the beginning of the 21st century, the advancement of information technology and globalization will continue to trigger a decline in the number of manufacturing jobs. To remain competitive in the global and national economy, closing the socioeconomic gaps between the dominant group and Hispanic Americans and other disadvantaged minority groups is more important now than ever. Future research in this area must focus on the growing racial/ethnic inequality in socioeconomic status, and examine public policies aimed at raising the Hispanic population’s level of human and social capital. This in turn will help close the education and earning gap in Idaho.
See an expanded PDF version of Dr. Wu's research.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Further Reading U.S. Census Bureau. “Coming to America: A Profile of the Nation’s Foreign Born (2000 Update) Census Brief: Current Population Survey. February 2002. U.S. Census Bureau. “The Hispanic Population in the United States.” Current Population Reports by Melissa Therrien and Roberto R. Ramirez. March 2000. Chavez, Linda. 1989. “Tequila Sunrise: The Slow but Steady Progress of Hispanic Immigrants.” Policy Review (Spring): 64-67. Farley, Reynolds and Richard Alba. 2002. “The New Second Generation in the United States.” International Migration Review 36 (Fall): 669-702. Gordon, Milton M. 1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, And National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press. Hirschman, Charles. 2001. “The Educational Enrollment of Immigrant Youth: A Test of the Segmented-Assimilation Hypothesis.” Demography 38 (August): 317-336. Kao, Grace and Marta Tienda. 1995. “Optimism and Achievement: The Educational Performance of Immigrant Youth.” Social Science Quarterly 76 (March): 1-19. |
Kasal, Russell. 1999. “Revisiting Assimilation: The Rise, Fall, and Reappraisal of a Concept in American Ethnic History.” In Majority and Minority: The Dynamics of Race and Ethnicity in American Life, 6th ed., edited by Norman R. Yetman (285-311). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Massey, Douglas. 1995. “The New Immigration and Ethnicity in the United States.” Population and Development Review 21 (September): 631-652. Passel, Jeffrey S. and Barry Edmonston. 1994. “Im migration and Race: Recent Trends in Immigration to the United States.” In Immigration and Ethnicity: The Integration of America’s Newest Arrivals, edited by Barry Edmonston and Jeffrey S. Passel (31-71). Washington D.C.: The Urban Institute Press. Ramirez, Roberto R. 2004. We the People: Hispanic in the United States. Census 2000 Special Report December Issued. U.S. Census Bureau: Washington D.C. Wojtkiewicz, Roger A. and Katherine M. Donato. 1995. “Hispanic Education Attainment: The Effects of Family Background and Nativity.” Social Forces 74 (December): 559-575. Zhou, Min. 1997. “Segmented Assimilation: Issues, Controversies, and Recent Research on the New Second Generation.” International Migration Review 31 (Winter): 975-1009. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||