Are you curious about exploring your teaching through a scholarly lens?
Do you have an idea to enhance your instruction and want to investigate its impact?
Are you interested in learning how to design and publish your own SoTL research?
Program Overview
The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) FLC guides participants step-by-step through the process of designing and conducting a SoTL study.
In the fall semester, participants will work through the steps of SoTL research, including refining project ideas and preparing IRB applications, while developing a community of SoTL scholars. In the spring semester the focus shifts to participants applying their intervention, collecting their research data, beginning to analyze the data, and reflecting on the process. During the summer months, participants work with the CTL SoTL consultant individually or in small groups to finalize their research and prepare the project for the publishing process.
Research commitments include (based on the project and methodology)
- Reviewing related existing literature in the field
- Implementing a teaching intervention in your course
- Collecting and analyzing student data (e.g., surveys, interviews)
- Disseminating findings in a journal article or conference presentation
Upon successful completion of the FLC, participants will receive a $700 stipend
This program is ideal for instructors who
- have a general idea for SoTL inquiry
- are seeking structured guidance and a supportive community of peers
- can commit 15+ hours of time to this work over the course of each semester
No previous SoTL experience is required.
How to Apply
To apply for the 2026–2027 SoTL FLC, submit this application form by August 28, 2026.
Applicants must
- have a SoTL project idea or curiosity that is related to the systematic inquiry about student learning and teaching practices (Need help with this part? Contact Sarah Lausch at sarahlausch@boisestate.edu)
- be able to collect project research data in Spring 2027 (e.g., must teach the appropriate class in the spring)
- be able to attend the bi-weekly cohort meetings (Thursdays 12:00 –1:30 PM) in FA and SP
- be an active (on contract) educator at Boise State for the duration of the program
Do you want to learn more?
Reach out to Sarah Lausch at sarahlausch@boisestate.edu with any questions.
References
- Felten, Peter. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 1(1), 121-125. Retrieved from https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/TLI/article/view/57376/43149.
- McKinney, Kathleen. (2007). Enhancing learning through the scholarship of teaching and learning: The challenges and joys of juggling. San Francisco, CA: Anker Publishing.
Previous Program Participants
2025/2026

Daibao Guo, Teaching, Learning, and Community Engagement (TLCE)
Daibao’s mixed-methods study examines how Magic School, a generative AI tool, affects preservice teachers’ lesson-planning skills in social studies and shapes their views on classroom AI integration. Using a quasi-experimental design, two groups will create lesson plans with and without AI assistance. The study will analyze lesson quality and explore teachers’ perceptions of AI benefits, limitations, and ethical considerations through reflections and interviews.
Jenée Cyran, Chemistry
Jenée’s project develops an undergraduate laboratory module using transient absorption (TA) spectroscopy to teach ultrafast photophysics and excited-state dynamics. Recently accessible through compact laser systems, TA spectroscopy will give students hands-on experience with real-time molecular dynamics while reinforcing quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and kinetics concepts.
Jiangmei Yuan, Educational Leadership, Research, and Technology
This mixed-methods study examines whether solving real-world problems enhances pre-service teachers’ AI literacy, self-efficacy, and actual AI integration practices. Conducted across two education technology course sections, the research aims to inform how to better prepare teachers for AI integration in their future classrooms.
Katie Conley, Teaching, Learning, and Community Engagement (TLCE)
This SoTL project examines how explicit teamwork instruction through Collaboration Futures professional development helps students learn collaboration skills in project-based courses. The instruction focuses on communication, role clarity, feedback, and inclusive team processes that support diverse working styles and engagement needs.
Kirsten Davis, Construction Management
Kirsten’s project examines whether early success in CMGT 310 predicts final course performance by analyzing pass rates on the first six test objectives against final grades. It will also compare student groups to assess how attendance and worksheet requirements affect this relationship. Findings will inform potential interventions to improve early student success and overall course outcomes.
Lorraine Gaudio, Anthropology
Lorraine’s project evaluates whether a redesigned Introduction to R Programming (DATA-R155) improves student learning and progression in an AI-rich era. Although many students are digital natives, they are not automatically digital learners; readily available code generation can both help and hinder learning. The redesign bundles updated materials, a shorter 7-week format, a new instructor, and specifications grading (checklist-based pass/not-yet with revision tokens) that emphasizes transparent standards and process documentation.
Lorraine presented a Lightning Talk at the 2026 Innovative Idaho conference on her research. Watch her presentation!
Megan Workman, Biological Sciences
Megan’s SoTL study investigates a chemistry intervention for BIOL191 and BIOL227 students to address knowledge gaps that contribute to high DFW rates in these COAS-SRI identified courses. It will evaluate both the intervention’s effectiveness and student engagement with the optional program.
MF Casper, Media
This study examines misalignment between student intent in course evaluation feedback and instructor interpretation. Through student surveys about their evaluation approach and instructor focus groups analyzing the same comments, the research aims to improve the evaluation process and outcomes for both parties. Benefits include better guidance for student feedback and enhanced instructor understanding of evaluation comments.